ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Co-occurrence of endometriosis and uterine fibroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Seedling fibroid characterization using optical coherence tomography.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-guided transabdominal microwave ablation versus laparoscopic myomectomy for FIGO type 3-5 uterine fibroids: a retrospective comparison of efficacy and safety.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endometriosis and uterine fibroids are estrogen-dependent gynecological disorders with an increasing burden to women's health worldwide. Despite overlapping symptoms and long-term consequences, the magnitude of their co-occurrence remains unclear. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus up to July 21st, 2025, for studies reporting data on fibroids occurrence in patients with and without endometriosis. Effect estimates (adjusted or, if unavailable, crude) were pooled using random-effects models. Age and body mass index (BMI) were explored in uni- and multivariate meta-regressions. Subgroup analyses considered study design, data source, geographic location, parity, age and study quality. Sensitivity analysis included only asymptomatic controls without endometriosis. Study quality and certainty of evidence were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation guidelines, respectively. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024614711). Findings: 4351 articles were identified, of which 23 met eligibility criteria, including 3,109,231 patients (118,716 with endometriosis and 2,990,515 controls). Endometriosis was associated with higher odds of fibroids (pooled OR 2.91; 95% CI, 1.78-4.75). BMI influenced estimates (p < 0.01). Between-group differences in data source (p < 0.01) and study quality (p = 0.03) were observed. Parity showed a trend effect: OR 1.56 (95% CI: 0.53-4.59) for studies with >50% nulliparous women, 4.52 (95% CI: 2.53-8.10) for those with >50% multiparous, 5.23 (95% CI, 2.09-13.04) for studies with >95% multiparous women. In sensitivity analysis with only asymptomatic controls (n = 3,103,146), the OR increased to 7.01 (95% CI: 4.72-10.41). Interpretation: This first meta-analysis on the co-occurrence of endometriosis and fibroids shows that women with endometriosis have a three-to tenfold higher odds of fibroids compared with controls. Clinical awareness of this association is crucial to optimize both patient management and short- and long-term women's health outcomes. Funding: This study was funded by the Italian Ministry of Health-Current research IRCCS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.