ReviewJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2025
Bibliometric analysis of prospective clinical trials on brachytherapy.
Review in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Brachytherapy is a well-established modality in oncology, particularly for prostate and cervical cancers, offering precise radiation delivery while sparing healthy tissues. Despite its clinical benefits, the research trajectory of brachytherapy in clinical trials remains underexplored. This bibliometric analysis aimed to assess publication trends, research focus areas, and citation impact of prospective clinical trials on brachytherapy. Material and methods: A bibliometric analysis was conducted using Web of Science database. Clinical trials were identified with key words "brachytherapy" and "prospective", without time restrictions. Bibliometric parameters analyzed included year of publication, journal distribution, authorship, institutional and geographical contributions, citation metrics, and disease focus. Results: A total of 84 clinical trials published between 1982 and 2024 were analyzed. The United States was the leading contributor (44.0%). Prostate cancer was the most frequently studied malignancy (35.7%), followed by breast (15.5%) and gynecologic cancers (13.1%). The "International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics" published the most trials. Citation analysis showed significant differences among cancer types, with soft tissue sarcoma studies having the highest median citation count ( Conclusions: While clinical trial research in brachytherapy has expanded over time, notable disparities in research intensity and citation impact exist among disease sites. Greater attention to underrepresented malignancies, along with sustained investment, interdisciplinary collaboration, and enhanced training, is needed to advance the role of brachytherapy in cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.