ArticlePreventive medicine reports2025
Tailored intervention for smoking cessation among migrant smokers in health centers for precarious people in Paris: A co-design approach.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Certain groups of migrants in Europe exhibit higher smoking prevalence compared to non-migrants, with social inequalities significantly impacting their health outcomes. Methods: Following an adapted experience-based co-design iterative process to gradually refine our crafted intervention, the study brought together migrants, health professionals, representatives from associations, and a research team between January and July 2024. Pre-workshop enabled to adapt ideation working tools to better suit the public. In the initial phase, migrants helped shape intervention design based on their tobacco use habits and preferences. Subsequent workshops benefitted medical and tobacco-expertise from healthcare workers in co-design workshops, refining our prototypes and ensuring they adhere to evidence-based practices. Data collection included questionnaires, audio-recordings, and field notes analyzed through thematic analysis. Results: Fourteen migrants (mostly undocumented, from African countries, and current smokers) and fourteen healthcare workers (mostly medical practitioners or nurses) were involved in the co-design sessions. The co-designed intervention consisted in a monthly face-to-face participant-led group discussion supervised by health professionals with flexible attendance combined with WhatsApp group support with facilitated access to nicotine replacement therapy or existing interventions, and adapted health literacy materials. Conclusion: Co-designing intervention with migrants enabled the development of an intervention addressing their barriers to smoking cessation. Combining peer-support, digital engagement, and facilitated access to existing resources may improve uptake and effectiveness of cessation programs among this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.