Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41048581›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in global women's health2025

Strengthening maternal healthcare in Ghana: utilizing the community-based health planning and services model as a vehicle.

Linus Baatiema

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in global women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Linus BaatiemaGhana Health Service, Upper West Regional Health Directorate, Wa, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction/aim: This review explores the Community-Based Health Planning and Services (CHPS) model and its impact on maternal healthcare delivery in Ghana's primary healthcare system. It highlights both the achievements and challenges of the initiative, focusing on community involvement, trained human resources, and effective referral linkages. Aim: To critically examine how CHPS model contributes to strengthening maternal healthcare delivery in Ghana, by assessing its successes, challenges, and potential for promoting equitable and sustainable health outcome. Methods: The study systematically reviewed literature from databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, and JSTOR, using keywords related to CHPS, maternal and child healthcare, reproductive health, and community health initiatives. Peer-reviewed articles, reports, and grey literature published within the past 10 years were prioritized, with additional insights drawn from references in the selected studies. The thematic areas were organized into maternal and child health services, reproductive health challenges, community health programs, and CHPS's role in addressing healthcare inequalities. Results: Findings reveal that, CHPS as a strategy has significant potential to improve maternal health outcomes, reduce mortality rates, and ensure equitable access to care for women in rural and underserved areas. Key challenges such as inadequate funding, staff shortages, political interference, and cultural barriers persist, limiting the model's overall impact. Conclusion: The study provides policy recommendations to enhance the effectiveness of the CHPS model and calls for a collective effort from health sector stakeholders to build a sustainable maternal healthcare system in Ghana.

Indexed as

CHPScommunity health management committees and community health volunteers (CHVs)community health officerscommunity involvementmaternal healthcareprimary healthcare

Identifiers

PMID41048581
PMCPMC12491247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.