ArticleJournal of mood and anxiety disorders2025
An examination of the impact of treatment on later risk for a substance use disorder in young people with major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder.
Article in Journal of mood and anxiety disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: We examined the impact of treatment of young people with major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BPD) on risk for subsequent substance use disorder (SUD). Methods: Patients aged 16-30 years seen at Mass General Brigham between 02/16/15 and 07/14/23 with MDD or BPD and no history of SUD were included. Diagnoses were determined using electronic health record data (billing codes, problem lists, patient-reported outcome measures, and other proxies of diagnosis(es)). Patients were treated or untreated based on pharmacological and/or psychosocial treatment following the onset of MDD/BPD and prior to SUD onset. Groups were matched on propensity scores (1:1) and compared on the development of SUD using a Cox regression model. Results: A total of 3601 and 796 patients (mean age 22.6 ± 4.3 years) were identified with no SUD and MDD or BPD, respectively. Final analysis of matched patients with and without treatment included 1666 with MDD and 314 with BPD. The most common treatment was pharmacologic only for MDD (89.3 %) and BPD (94.3 %). Overall, there was no significant difference in the development of SUD between those treated and not treated for MDD (HR=1.06 [0.84, 1.32], p = 0.63) nor those treated and not treated for BPD (HR=0.80 [0.49, 1.30], p = 0.37). However, longer duration of treatment for both MDD and BPD was associated with a significant reduction in risk for SUD. There was a 2.1 % risk reduction for each additional cumulative month of treatment for MDD (HR=0. 979 [0.976, 0.981], p < 0.001) and a 2.6 % risk reduction for each additional cumulative month of treatment for BPD (HR=0.974 [0.968, 0.979], p < 0.001). Conclusion: Longer treatment duration for young people with MDD and BPD is associated with decreased SUD risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.