ArticleFrontiers in medical technology2025
Improving accuracy in percutaneous lung puncture using thoracic respiratory synchronization and laser angle guidance.
Article in Frontiers in medical technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the feasibility of enhancing the accuracy of percutaneous lung puncture through matching the respiratory activity of the thorax and performing puncture under the guidance of a laser angle guider. Methods: A retrospective case-control study was adopted. Collected data of patients with pulmonary nodules undergoing puncture. They were categorized into the conventional puncture group (Con group), the laser guidance group (Laser group), and the thoracic respiratory activity matching group (Ram group) based on whether the puncture was guided by the laser angle guider and the application of the thorax respiratory activity matching technique. Results: 277 patients were included: 96 in the Con group, 93 in the Laser group, and 88 in the Ram group. There were no statistically significant differences in the puncture purpose, age, gender, BMI, maximum diameter of pulmonary nodules, location of pulmonary nodules, and distance from the skin at the puncture point among the three groups ( Conclusion: Puncture by matching the thoracic respiratory activity and under the guidance of a laser angle guider can effectively improve the accuracy of percutaneous lung puncture, reduce complications. Furthermore, the procedure is straightforward, warranting further evaluation in larger, prospective studies. Clinical trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR), identifier (ChiCTR2300069384).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.