Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41048513›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025

MoEPH: an adaptive fusion-based LLM for predicting phage-host interactions in health informatics.

Qian Chen, Zihang Zhao, Min Li, Wenchen Song, Minfeng Xiao, Min Fang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qian ChenSchool of Artificial Intelligence and National Engineering Laboratory for Big Data System Computing Technology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Zihang ZhaoSchool of Computer Science and Technology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Min LiBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Wenchen SongBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Minfeng XiaoBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Min FangEducation Center of Experiments and Innovations, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phage-host interaction prediction plays a crucial role in the development of phage therapy, particularly in combating antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Current in silico models often suffer from limited generalizability and low interpretability. To address these gaps, we introduce MoEPH (Mixture-of-Experts for Phage-Host prediction), a novel framework that integrates transformer-based protein embeddings (ProtBERT and ProT5) with domain-specific statistical descriptors. Our model dynamically combines features using a gated fusion mechanism, ensuring robust and adaptive prediction. We evaluate MoEPH on three publicly available phage-host interaction databases: Dataset 1 (101 host strains, 129 phages), Dataset 2 (38 host strains, 176 phages), and Dataset 3 (combined). Experimental results demonstrate that MoEPH outperforms existing methods, achieving an accuracy of 99.6% on balanced datasets and a 31% improvement on highly imbalanced data. The model provides a transparent, dynamic and knowledge-driven fusion solution for phage-host prediction, contributing to more effective phage therapy recommendations. Future work will focus on incorporating structural protein features and exploring alternative neural backbones for further enhancement.

Indexed as

interpretablemixture of experts (MoE)robustnesstransformer-based protein embeddingstrustworthy phage-host prediction

Identifiers

PMID41048513
PMCPMC12488635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.