Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41048474›Full record

ArticleFederal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS2025

Comprehensive Genomic Profiles of Melanoma in Veterans Compared to Reference Databases.

Daniel Mettman, Margaryta Stoieva, Maryam Abdo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel MettmanKansas City Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Missouri.
Margaryta StoievaUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City.
Maryam AbdoUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Veterans represent a unique patient population with various exposures that may predispose them to cancer. Mutational signatures associated with these exposures are described in other tumor types. Methods: This retrospective review analyzes the comprehensive genomic profiling reports of 35 veterans with metastatic melanoma at a large US Department of Veterans Affairs medical center. The genomic findings were compared with those from the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer and The Cancer Genome Atlas. Results: The melanomas found in these veterans showed a significantly higher frequency of variants in Conclusions: The presence of statistically significant differences between the genomic findings from the veterans' melanomas and those of general population melanomas from reference databases suggests that additional research is warranted to corroborate these differences and clarify their etiologic, prognostic, and therapeutic relevance.

Identifiers

PMID41048474
PMCPMC12494343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.