Trial reportClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Comparison of Post-Operative Outcomes between IOP-20 and IOP-50 in Phacoemulsification with Active Fluidics System: Randomized Single Blinded Trial.
Trial report in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Occlusion Break Surge and Anterior Chamber Stability in the Intraocular Environment of Modern Phacoemulsification: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Does Further Lowering Intraoperative Intraocular Pressure Reduce Surgical Invasiveness in Active-Fluidics Eight-Chop Phacoemulsification? A Fellow-Eye Comparative Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the central corneal thickness, mitigation events, post-operative vision, and complications in patients who underwent cataract surgery using the CENTURION Setting: Wavikar Eye Institute, Thane, India. Design: A prospective comparative two arm, randomized, single blinded, interventional study. Methods: A total of 107 eyes were randomized to either the IOP-20 (n=55) or IOP-50 (n=52) group. All patients underwent phacoemulsification with an active fluidics system performed by a single surgeon; intraocular pressure (IOP) was set at either 20 or 50 mmHg. Results: The mean [SD] baseline CCT in the IOP-20 group was 511.9 [35.7] μm and it was 521.1 [34.8] μm in the IOP 50 group (p=0.18). It had changed to 530.6 [39.8] μm in the IOP-20 group and 539.5 [39.2] μm in the IOP 50 (p=0.24). The mean [SD] ECD at the end of day 90 was 2423.0 [204.6] cells/mm Conclusion: We found that the phacoemulsification with an active fluidics system handpiece at 20 mmHg provided a safe and stable environment for cataract surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.