Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41048432›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2025

Chapter 3. Impact of estrogens on hemostasis.

Frank Z Stanczyk, Intira Sriprasert, Shinnisha Chulapongwanich, Jane L Yang, Franca Fruzzetti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Frank Z StanczykDept of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Intira SriprasertDept of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Shinnisha ChulapongwanichPrincess Srisavangavadhana College of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jane L YangDept of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Franca FruzzettiClinica San Rossore, Viale delle Cascine, Pisa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well established that estrogens increase the risk of both arterial and venous thrombosis. Abnormally high levels of some coagulation factors combined with a decrease in anticoagulation factors contribute to thrombotic risk. Although estrogens are known to affect multiple hemostatic markers, the exact molecular mechanism of estrogen-induced thrombosis is unclear. However, small changes in these markers with different types, doses, and/or routes of estrogens may increase thrombotic risk. Most studies on the effect of estrogens have been carried out in premenopausal women using combined oral contraceptives (COCs); studies in postmenopausal women using hormone therapy (HT) are scarce. Short-term studies comparing hemostatic parameters in women receiving either ethinyl estradiol (EE) or estradiol (E

Indexed as

EstrogensHemostasisContraceptives, Oral, CombinedFemaleHumansVenous ThromboembolismContraceptives, Oral, CombinedEstrogenscoagulationcombined oral contraceptiveestrogensfibrinolysishemostatic markershormone therapypostmenopausal womenthrombosis

Identifiers

PMID41048432
PMCPMC12488444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.