ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Causal insights into gestational diabetes mellitus.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), defined by the onset of hyperglycaemia during pregnancy, remains the most prevalent metabolic complication in pregnancy. It is associated with increased risks of adverse maternal, neonatal, and long-term metabolic outcomes. This study aimed to identify potential causal relationships within clinical data on GDM that could support more targeted and effective interventions. Methods: A clinically curated dataset of patients diagnosed with GDM at a major Irish maternity hospital was analysed, covering the study periods 2014-2016 and 2020. A knowledge graph was constructed by integrating clinical expertise, established literature, and insights generated using the GPT-4 large language model. To complement this, 20 structure learning algorithms were applied to independently infer Causal Bayesian Networks (CBNs). A model-averaging approach was then used to generate a consensus-based causal structure to account for variability across individual models. Results: The integrative model produced a more stable representation of underlying relationships and yielded quantifiable insights to support clinical decision-making. Clinicians involved in the study reported improved confidence in patient care strategies due to the ability to quantify these relationships, facilitating more personalised, evidence-based practice. Key findings from the model-averaged CBN highlighted critical pathways in GDM management, such as the influence of birth weight on neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions and the impact of dietary intervention on maternal glucose regulation. Sensitivity analysis confirmed birth weight, gestational age at delivery, and mode of delivery as major determinants of maternal and neonatal outcomes. Non-modifiable factors, including a history of multiple pregnancies and prior GDM, also contributed to risk stratification. Discussion: This study applied structure learning techniques to observational clinical data to identify clinically relevant relationships. The resulting insights provide a basis for generating hypotheses that could refine intervention strategies and improve patient outcomes in GDM care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.