ArticleInternational journal of sports physical therapy2025
Interpreting Quadriceps Strength Thresholds for Patients Following ACL-Reconstruction: A Clinical Commentary.
Article in International journal of sports physical therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rehabilitation following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) is a complex process involving the restoration of muscular strength, movement patterns, and functional confidence. Clinical thresholds, defined target values tied to successful outcomes, are frequently used to guide rehabilitation and assess patient progress. While these thresholds may promote rehabilitation advancement and the establishment of structured goals, substantial variability exists in their values and how they are developed. Clinical thresholds are typically established by linking an independent variable (e.g., quadriceps strength) to a dichotomized outcome (e.g., return to running, return to sport, patient-reported function cutoff, etc.). Statistical tools like Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analyses are used to determine a single strength value that best predicts a successful outcome, based on the sensitivity and specificity of predicting the outcome. Despite this standardized approach, existing thresholds differ significantly due to variations in outcome definitions, cohort characteristics, and strength testing protocols. This clinical commentary aims to (1) describe the methodology used to establish clinical thresholds, (2) discuss statistical considerations for interpreting these thresholds, and (3) examine the implications of variability in quadriceps strength targets for patient following ACLR. Level of Evidence: 5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.