Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41048411›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of sports physical therapy2025

Feasibility and Concurrent Validity of Pediatric Performance-Based Postural Control Subtests Using a Pressure-Sensitive Exergaming Device: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Jorn Ockerman, Anke Van Bladel, Edouard Auvinet, Jelle Saldien, Hilde Van Waelvelde, Lynn Bar-On

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of sports physical therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jorn OckermanDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences Ghent University.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7466-9047
Anke Van BladelDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences Ghent University.
Edouard AuvinetCentre de Recherche et de Développement ECAM School of Engineering.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6708-2499
Jelle SaldienDepartment of Industrial Systems Engineering and Product Design Ghent University.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2557-3764
Hilde Van WaelveldeDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences Ghent University.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7330-7615
Lynn Bar-OnDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences Ghent University.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4793-2860

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postural control deficits are common among children with and without disabilities. Performance-based postural control tests provide both quantitative and qualitative insights into the severity of these deficits but are underutilized in clinical practice. Digitizing existing postural control tests could increase their overall implementation. # Purpose This study examined the feasibility and validity of 'Matti', a pressure-sensitive device, as a tool for recording simple continuous data for two performance-based postural control subtests: the time in seconds during the One-Board Balance Test (OBBT) and the number of jumps during the Lateral Jump Test (LJT), in typically developing children. # Study Design Cross-sectional study # Methods Both conventional and digitized versions of both the OBBT and LJT were administered. The conventional test condition was rated by an observer, while the digitized version was scored by both an observer and analysis software using Matti's sensor data. Correlation analyses, comparisons of the mean or median, and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess concurrent validity and level of agreement between conventional and digitized test conditions, as well as between observed and digital outcomes of the digitized test condition. The level of enjoyment between conventional and digital testing was evaluated using a Smiley-o-Meter. # Results Forty-six children (average age 8.98 (±1.04) years, 10 female) participated in this study. Digitized testing showed strong correlations between digital and observer-based outcomes for both the digital OBBT (rs=.991, p<0.001) and LJT (r=.962, p<0.001). However, differences were noted between conventional and digitized conditions. Participants reported significantly higher levels of enjoyment during digital testing (Z=-2.530; p = 0.011). # Conclusion The Matti demonstrates good feasibility for a simple digitized performance-based postural control test. However, differences between the scores of conventional and digitized test conditions indicate a lack of concurrent validity with conventional clinical tests. The higher perceived enjoyment reported during digital testing suggests its potential as a valuable tool in pediatric postural control assessment and rehabilitation.

Indexed as

AssessmentChildrenPostural ControlRehabilitation Technology

Identifiers

PMID41048411
PMCPMC12490891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.