Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41048406›Full record

ArticleClimatic change2025

Innovations in the climate assessment development process.

Allison R Crimmins, Christopher W Avery, David R Reidmiller, Aaron M Grade

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Climatic change, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Allison R CrimminsNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1315 East West Hwy, SSMC III, Silver Spring, MD 20910 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1273-6069
Christopher W AveryIndependent Researcher, Cambridge, MA US.ORCID 0000-0002-0297-2685
David R ReidmillerGulf of Maine Research Institute, 350 Commercial St, Portland, ME 04101 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9321-7548
Aaron M GradeICF, 1902 Reston Metro Plaza, Reston, VA 20190 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5870-4786

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate assessments have long been key scientific inputs that inform the development of productive and impactful climate policy in the United States and around the world. This introduction sets the stage for the suite of papers in the Topical Collection "Advancements in U.S. Climate Assessments." Inspired and informed by the release of the Fifth National Climate Assessment, the papers within this issue document lessons learned over the past 30+ years and leverage the perspectives of previous assessment authors and staff to aid those interested in developing their own climate assessments. This paper reviews the evolution of climate assessments and the factors that make for useful, usable, and used scientific products to support societal choices. Evolving user needs over the last 30+ years also reflect a shift in demand towards more localized or more context-specific climate data that integrates social science information, tools, and frameworks. To meet these needs, we highlight three areas of potential opportunity and challenge for future assessments: continued and strengthened conversations between assessment developers across geographic scale to share innovations and lessons learned in the development process; working with knowledge holders in under-represented areas of expertise to alter assessment governance and guidelines to better incorporate diverse perspectives; and seizing opportunities for using innovative communication and engagement mediums.

Indexed as

AssessmentClimate changeClimate policyClimate servicesScience communication

Identifiers

PMID41048406
PMCPMC12488836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.