Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41048405›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal open2025

Netherlands Heart Registration-based multicentre retrospective cohort study on primary PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: comparing patient relevant outcomes in on- vs. off-hour presentations.

Lineke Derks, Marijke J C Timmermans, Daniel M F Claassens, Dennis van Veghel, Krischan D Sjauw, Peter Danse, Karin Arkenbout, Dirk J van der Heijden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lineke DerksNetherlands Heart Registration, Moreelsepark 1, Utrecht 3511 EP, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8435-6474
Marijke J C TimmermansNetherlands Heart Registration, Moreelsepark 1, Utrecht 3511 EP, The Netherlands.
Daniel M F ClaassensDepartment of Cardiology, Tergooi MC, Postbus 10016, 1201 DA Hilversum, The Netherlands.
Dennis van VeghelNetherlands Heart Registration, Moreelsepark 1, Utrecht 3511 EP, The Netherlands.
Krischan D SjauwDepartment of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Postbus 2500, 3430 EM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Peter DanseDepartment of Cardiology, Rijnstate, Postbus 9555, 6800 TA Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Karin ArkenboutDepartment of Cardiology, Tergooi MC, Postbus 10016, 1201 DA Hilversum, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0109-2792
Dirk J van der HeijdenDepartment of Cardiology, Isala, Postbus 10400, 8000 GK Zwolle, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Over recent decades, numerous measures have been implemented to improve treatment and timely intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). For deeper insights into the current state of care, this study investigates whether patient outcomes differ based on the timing of presentation (on-hours vs. off-hours) for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STEMI. Methods and results: Data from STEMI PCIs performed from 2017 to October 2020, as registered within the Netherlands Heart Registration (NHR), were analysed. Off-hours presentation was defined as arrival at the catheterization laboratory (cath lab) on weekends, during working days between 17.00 and 08.00, or Monday between midnight and 08.00. Short-term outcomes included 30-day all-cause mortality and acute MI within 30 days. Long-term outcomes included all-cause mortality rates up till 5 years after PCI, target vessel revascularization within 1 year, and repeat revascularization with elective or non-STEMI PCI. The study included 19 090 STEMI patients from 17 centres, with 11 719 (61.4%) PCIs performed on-hours. No significant difference in 30-day mortality was observed between on-hours and off-hours patients (5.7% vs. 5.8%). On-hours patients had a longer time from symptom onset to cath lab arrival (≤6 h: 80.2% vs. 84.4%, Conclusion: Outcomes after primary PCI for STEMI are comparable between on-hours and off-hours presentations. The quality of care appears to be independent of time of arrival at the cath lab.

Indexed as

After-hours careMyocardial infarctionPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)Quality of careSTEMITreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID41048405
PMCPMC12492485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.