ArticlePeerJ2025
Metabolomic and physiological analysis of bud differentiation in dense apple
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrated Proteomics and Metabolomics Analysis Reveals Regulatory Mechanisms Underlying Flower Bud Development in Camellia drupifera.Biochemical genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In China, a majority of apple orchards were initially planted under arboriculture. The branch number increases, causing a deterioration of the canopy light conditions as the trees age. This phenomenon blocks bud differentiation, resulting in yield decrease and deterioration of fruit quality. Thinning and reshaping are effective strategies for addressing these issues. However, the impact of thinning and reshaping remains unclear. This study analyzed the physiological and metabolic aspects of flower bud differentiation following thinning and reshaping of an overcrowded orchard. Methods: Physiological and metabolomic analyses were conducted on terminal flower bud samples collected during early (T1) and late (T2) bud differentiation following thinning and reshaping alongside controls CK1 and CK2. Results: Sucrose, glucose, fructose, and sorbitol contents in T1 and T2 groups were significantly higher than in CK1 and CK2. Metabolomic analysis revealed significant differences: 60 metabolites (32 up-regulated, 28 down-regulated) in T1 Conclusions: Thinning and reshaping improved light penetration and increased the accumulation of nutrients and secondary metabolites. Sucrose, glucose, fructose, and sorbitol contents and the relative levels of coumarin, eriodictyol, and histidine increased during early and late flower bud differentiation stages, which suggested their positive roles during these stages. 2-isopropylmalic acid, (+)-catechin, and trans-ferulic acid exhibited metabolic activation potential, while 3',5'-dimethoxyflavone and 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvic acid were distinctly regulated in T1
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.