ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2025
Quantitative measures to assess the quality of cellular indexing of transcriptomes and epitopes by sequencing data.
Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cellular indexing of transcriptomes and epitopes by sequencing (CITE-Seq) is a powerful technique to simultaneously measure gene expression and cell surface protein abundances in individual cells. To obtain accurate and reliable biological findings from CITE-Seq data, it is critical to ensure rigorous quality control (QC). However, no public method has yet been developed for CITE-Seq QC. Results: In this study, we propose the first software package for multi-layered, systemic, and quantitative quality control (CITESeQC). Recognizing the multi-layered nature of CITE-Seq data, CITESeQC performs QC across gene expressions, surface proteins, and their interactions. It systemically evaluates all genes and protein markers assayed in the data and filters out some of them based on individual quality measures. Furthermore, for quantitative QC that enables objective and standardized analyses, CITESeQC quantifies cell type-specific expression of genes and surface proteins using Shannon entropy and correlation-based measures. Finally, to ensure broad applicability, CITESeQC guides users through a simple process that generates a complete markdown report with supporting figures and explanations, requiring minimal user intervention. Conclusion: By quantifying the quality of CITE-Seq data, CITESeQC enables precise characterization of gene expression within cell types and reliable classification of cell types using surface protein markers, thereby enhancing its value for clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.