ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2025
Interpretable artificial intelligence based on immunoregulation-related genes predicts prognosis and immunotherapy response in lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Immunotherapy Efficacy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the most common subtype of non-small cell lung cancer, and its benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is controversial, especially for patients without driver gene mutations. The potential of immunoregulation-related genes (IRGs) in predicting the prognosis of LUAD and the efficacy of immunotherapy becomes emerging. There is an urgent need to establish a reliable IRGs-based predictive model of ICI response. Methods: Extract and merge LUAD RNA sequencing data and clinical data from GEO database. The differences in genomic and tumor microenvironment (TME) cell infiltration landscape between normal lung tissue and tumor tissue were comprehensively analyzed. Unsupervised consistent cluster analysis based on genes related to immune regulation was performed on the samples. ESTIMATE and TIMER algorithms were used to analyze the infiltration of immune cells in different groups, and TIDE score was used to evaluate the effectiveness of immunotherapy. Then, lasso regression was used to establish a prognostic model based on identified key IRGs. XGBoost machine learning algorithm was further developed, with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to interpret the model. Results: The GEO LUAD cohort was divided into two clusters based on IRG expression, with significantly better survival outcomes and immune cell infiltration in the IRG-high group compared to the IRG-low group. TIDE scores indicated that the group with high IRG pattern showed a better response to ICI treatment. Then, we developed an IRG index (IRGI) model based on identified 2 key IRGs, GREM1 and PLAU, and IRGI effectively divided patients into high-risk and low-risk groups, revealing significant differences in prognosis, mutational profiles, and immune cell infiltration in the TME between two groups. Subsequently, the interpretable XBGoost machine learning model established based on IRGs could further improve the predictive performance (AUC = 0.975), and SHAP analysis demonstrated that GREM1 had the greatest impact on the overall prediction. Discussion: IRGI can be used as a valuable biomarker to predict LUAD patient prognosis and response to ICIs. IRGs play a crucial role in shaping the diversity and complexity of TME cell infiltration, which may provide valuable guidance for ICI treatment decisions for LUAD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.