ReviewInternational journal of women's health2025
Exploring the Fertility Needs of Women Before and After Oocyte Freezing for Medical and Non-Medical Reasons: A Scoping Review.
Review in International journal of women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Oocyte cryopreservation represents an effective strategy for fertility preservation among women of reproductive age. The most consistent and robust body of evidence highlights female age at the time of oocyte retrieval as the single most critical biological determinant of reproductive outcomes. While fertility preservation enhances women's reproductive autonomy, it simultaneously presents significant challenges regarding the adoption and integration of this advanced technology. Methods: We reviewed seven databases to assess the fertility needs of women before and after oocyte freezing for medical and non-medical reasons. The inclusion criteria targeted studies on fertility preservation in women, excluding research involving men, adolescents, and transgender individuals. Out of the 2550 screened publications, 44 studies met the eligibility requirements and were included. Results: The synthesis revealed five key areas of reproductive needs for women before and after oocyte freezing. Included counseling and fertility-related information, decision-making support, and emotional care. Furthermore, obtaining informed consent and issues related to the secondary use of frozen eggs are critical considerations for healthcare providers. Conclusion: Realistic counseling is essential to ensure that women understand both the opportunities and limitations of oocyte freezing. Balanced, evidence-based guidance can help women make informed decisions while avoiding unrealistic expectations. Future efforts should focus on integrating fertility preservation education into public health strategies, expanding insurance or subsidy programs to reduce financial burden, and developing culturally sensitive counseling frameworks. Trial Registration: This review was registered at PROSPERO with Registration ID: CRD42021223906.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.