Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41048314›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2025

HPV Infection in Women with ASC-US in Eastern Marmara, Türkiye: Genotype Prevalence and Clinical Implications.

Gunel Guliyeva, Osman Köse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gunel Guliyeva *Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, MEDAR Private Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID 0009-0005-4051-5476
Osman Köse *Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya, 54290, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-5656-6853

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the distribution of human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes, age-specific prevalence, and their association with histopathological outcomes in women with cervical cytology results reported as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and concurrent high-risk HPV (hr-HPV) positivity. Patients and Methods: Among 39,189 records screened between October 2019 and October 2024, 705 patients with ASC-US and hr-HPV positivity were included. HPV genotyping was performed using real-time PCR, cytological evaluation followed the Bethesda System, and colposcopic biopsies were classified according to the Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology (LAST) guidelines. Results: HPV-16 (25.6%), HPV-51 (7%), and HPV-31 (6.5%) were the most prevalent genotypes, detected in 28.2% (n=199) of hr-HPV-positive cases. HPV-16 demonstrated the strongest association with high-grade lesions, accounting for 47.6% of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+). Multiple HPV infections correlated with an elevated risk of CIN2+. Age-stratified analysis revealed HPV-16 predominance in women aged 40-49 years, whereas HPV-51 was more frequent in those ≥60 years. Conclusion: In ASC-US cases, HPV-16 is the predominant genotype and a significant predictor of high-grade cervical lesions. The unexpectedly high prevalence of HPV-51 and HPV-31 in this Turkish cohort underscores the importance of tailoring screening algorithms to regional genotype distributions. Furthermore, the observed age-specific variations in genotype prevalence highlight the need for age-adjusted management strategies.

Indexed as

ASC-UScervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2+colposcopyHPV genotypingTurkish population

Identifiers

PMID41048314
PMCPMC12495964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.