ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Quality assessment of short videos on health science popularization in China: scale development and validation.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality, Reliability, and Viewer Engagement of YouTube Videos on Esophageal Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- The quality and reliability of short videos about Sjögren syndrome on TikTok and Bilibili: A cross-sectional study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluating a Culturally Tailored Digital Storytelling Intervention to Improve Trauma Awareness in Conflict-Affected Eastern Congo: Quasi-Experimental Pilot Study.JMIR mental health · 2026Article
- Empowering knowledge dissemination: a 5A model for health professionals in IVF health communication through short videos.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The reliability and quality of short videos as a source of dietary guidance for cardiovascular disease: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Agreement between artificial intelligence and expert evaluation in assessing the quality of asthma health education videos on YouTube and Bilibili: cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The quality and reliability of short videos about myocardial infarction on TikTok: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The theoretical impact of AI-based quality evaluation of short-video health information on public cognition and treatment adherence: a case study of denosumab combined with PD-1/PD-L1 therapy for lung cancer bone metastasis.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Quality of ovarian cancer videos on TikTok, Rednote, and WeChat: A public health perspective.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Short videos that popularize health science have become essential for disseminating health information and enhancing public health literacy. However, previous research has primarily focused on health information content, with a significant gap in assessing the quality of health science popularization in short videos. Methods: This study developed a quality assessment scale for the popularization of health science short videos based on multimodal theory, utilizing literature analysis and the creation of custom measurement items. Data were collected from scales completed by 796 residents through online surveys conducted on mobile devices. Both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were employed to evaluate the quality of mobile health science popularized short videos. Results: The results revealed that the quality scale for health science popularization in short videos could be divided into seven dimensions and 22 indicators, each a significant determinant of video quality. Conclusion: This research provides a more intuitive, reliable, and standardized tool for assessing the quality of health science popularization in short videos. Also, it offers essential guidance for the future design, development, and promotion of short health science popularization videos.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.