Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41048294›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Using threshold Cox models to estimate change points in exposure-response relationships in an occupational epidemiological study of respirable crystalline silica and silicosis risk.

Diezhang Wu, Kenneth A Mundt, Jing Qian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Diezhang WuDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, United States.
Kenneth A MundtDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, United States.
Jing QianDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In occupational epidemiology, accurately quantifying exposure-response relationships is crucial. Methods: We introduce a threshold Cox model that includes a change point term to identify the optimal threshold. To address bias associated with maximum likelihood estimation under monotone likelihood, we employ Firth's penalized likelihood approach. The methodology was validated using simulation studies that evaluated model performance under various censoring rates and sample sizes. We applied our threshold Cox model to data from an occupational epidemiological study of respirable crystalline silica (RCS) exposure and risk of silicosis (defined as ILO category 1/0 or higher). To improve the condition of the data for analysis using Cox regression, which is sensitive to small proportions of events, we included all silicosis cases, and for each case we density-sampled four non-cases from workers in the same production areas (mostly materials preparation). Results: Thresholds for (a) cumulative RCS exposure and (b) average RCS exposure intensity over 2 years and 5 years were identified as 4.038 mg/m Results and Discussion: These quantified exposure thresholds may be useful in verifying that occupational exposure limits are protective against silicosis and for quantitative risk assessment. This methodology also could be applied to other exposure-disease relationships to identify and quantify possible exposure thresholds.

Indexed as

Occupational ExposureSilicon DioxideSilicosisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsSilicon Dioxidechange pointexposure-response relationshipFirth's penalized likelihoodheavy censoringoccupational epidemiologyrespirable crystalline silicasilicosisthreshold Cox model

Identifiers

PMID41048294
PMCPMC12491331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.