ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Using threshold Cox models to estimate change points in exposure-response relationships in an occupational epidemiological study of respirable crystalline silica and silicosis risk.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Challenges in defining thresholds for health effects: some considerations for asbestos and silica.Frontiers in epidemiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In occupational epidemiology, accurately quantifying exposure-response relationships is crucial. Methods: We introduce a threshold Cox model that includes a change point term to identify the optimal threshold. To address bias associated with maximum likelihood estimation under monotone likelihood, we employ Firth's penalized likelihood approach. The methodology was validated using simulation studies that evaluated model performance under various censoring rates and sample sizes. We applied our threshold Cox model to data from an occupational epidemiological study of respirable crystalline silica (RCS) exposure and risk of silicosis (defined as ILO category 1/0 or higher). To improve the condition of the data for analysis using Cox regression, which is sensitive to small proportions of events, we included all silicosis cases, and for each case we density-sampled four non-cases from workers in the same production areas (mostly materials preparation). Results: Thresholds for (a) cumulative RCS exposure and (b) average RCS exposure intensity over 2 years and 5 years were identified as 4.038 mg/m Results and Discussion: These quantified exposure thresholds may be useful in verifying that occupational exposure limits are protective against silicosis and for quantitative risk assessment. This methodology also could be applied to other exposure-disease relationships to identify and quantify possible exposure thresholds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.