Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41048291›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Patience is a virtue: lessons from a participatory approach to contextually tailor and co-create an employee wellness intervention for community health educators.

Mary C Frazier, Megan J Pullin, Samantha M Harden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mary C FrazierTranslational Biology, Medicine, and Health, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, VA, United States.
Megan J PullinDepartment of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Blacksburg, VA, United States.
Samantha M HardenDepartment of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Blacksburg, VA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Community health educators (CHE) translate empirical health evidence into actionable information to improve the health and wellbeing of communities, including underserved populations. However, the wellbeing of CHE themselves is threatened by chronic work-related stress. One understudied CHE cohort are employees of the federal Cooperative Extension System (herein: Cooperative Extension). The objective of this present study was to co-create a wellness intervention that is feasible and acceptable to CHE of Cooperative Extension. Methods: Applying a co-creation method, we first gathered formative data from an ongoing integrated research-practice partnership (IRPP) with CHE of Cooperative Extension to guide adaptations on intervention content, dose, and delivery. IRPP members shared key intervention considerations which informed a sequential exploratory mixed-methods approach. To garner contextual considerations and phenomena, we conducted four focus group sessions with CHE from nine different states ( Results: Members of the IRPP preferred holistic wellbeing, i.e., flourishing, as a comprehensive target for a CHE wellness intervention. Eighty-one percent ( Discussion: Data from co-creation methods with CHE captured often overlooked nuance important for implementation, particularly tailoring the timing of intervention delivery. Beginning with the end in mind and taking careful consideration of contextual factors may improve feasibility and acceptability of intervention characteristics and ultimately increase reach, representativeness, and efficacy.

Indexed as

Health EducatorsHealth PromotionAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle Agedadaptationco-creationdisseminationflourishingholisticimplementationwellbeingyoga

Identifiers

PMID41048291
PMCPMC12491061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.