ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Reconsidering dependence on life-sustaining treatment as a criterion for assisted suicide: the Italian legal unicum in comparative perspective.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The legalization of Medical Assisted Voluntary Death, including assisted suicide is spreading worldwide, alongside the recognition of the centrality of the patient's right to self-determination even in case of therapeutic desistance. In Italy Law-no. 219/2017 has granted patients the option of refusing therapy including life-sustaining treatments even without justification. The present paper offers a critical analysis of the legal-normative aspects and ethical-clinical implications of constraining assisted suicide to dependence on life-sustaining treatments. Reviewing some of the key bioethical-legal pronouncements, we discuss the current Italian system on assisted suicide in which dependence on life-sustaining treatment, even after the recent Constitutional sentences, is still one of the mandatory requirements, despite several critical profiles. Through a literature overview on medical life-sustaining treatments notion, the dependence on them is analyzed and assessed in clinical, bioethical and validity terms as a requirement for access to assisted suicide. From this it appears how dependence on life-sustaining treatment constraint shows overly ambiguous definitional boundaries, with the risk of inhomogeneous interpretations especially in the Italian framework. Interestingly, our comparative analysis reveals that Italy is a global legal unicum among the main international systems regulating Medical Assisted Voluntary Death; which, conversely, tend to target the issue on terminally or irreversibly suffering patients, independently of dependence on life-sustaining treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.