ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
From mother to infant: predicting infant temperament using maternal mental health measures and tabular machine learning models.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting Infant Sleep Patterns From Postpartum Maternal Mental Health Measures: Machine Learning Approach.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2026Article
- Multimodal large language models for women's reproductive mental health.Archives of women's mental health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Negative emotionality is a core dimension of infant temperament, characterized by heightened distress, reactivity, and difficulty with self-regulation. It has been consistently associated with later behavioral and emotional difficulties. Emerging evidence suggests that maternal mental health (MMH) in the postpartum period may influence infant temperament. However, few studies have applied machine learning (ML) methods to examine the predictive capacity of MMH profiles for early infant emotional development. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate whether postpartum maternal depression, anxiety, and birth-related trauma, along with sociodemographic factors, can predict infant negative emotionality during the first year postpartum using tabular ML models. Methods: Data were obtained from 410 mother-infant dyads. Infant temperament was assessed using the Negative Emotionality subscale of the Infant Behavior Questionnaire-Revised (IBQ-R). MMH symptoms were measured via the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the City Birth Trauma Scale (City BiTS). Six tabular ML models were trained using MMH and demographic features: Tabular Prior-Data Fitted Network (TabPFN), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Categorical Boosting (CatBoost), Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine (SVM). Performance was evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic Area Under The Curve (ROC-AUC), Precision-Recall Area Under the Curve (PR-AUC), F1-score, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: Postpartum MMH symptoms and maternal-infant characteristics moderately predicted infant negative emotionality. LightGBM achieved the highest performance across ROC-AUC (0.76), F1-score (0.72), sensitivity (0.71), and specificity (0.73). TabPFN yielded the highest PR-AUC (0.78). Key predictors included gestational age, infant's age, EPDS score, mother's age, HADS score, and City BiTS score. Conclusions: These findings highlight the potential of ML tools in early identification of at-risk infants and the importance of integrating MMH screening into postnatal care. Such predictive insights can inform timely, personalized interventions that address the unique emotional needs of both mother and infant, ultimately fostering healthier developmental trajectories and enhancing overall family well being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.