ReviewBrain : a journal of neurology2026
Ageing and remyelination failure in people with multiple sclerosis.
Review in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spider-MS: an individualized polyhedral prediction of multiple sclerosis prognosis.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026Article
- TRIM21 promotes astrocyte-mediated neuroinflammation in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by stabilizing RGMa via K33-linked ubiquitination.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
One of the most promising strategies to delay, prevent, or reverse disability progression in multiple sclerosis is enhancing endogenous remyelination. While preclinical research has established a strong connection between ageing and remyelination failure, evidence for this same link in people with multiple sclerosis remains less secure. As clinical trials for remyelinating therapies progress, clarifying this relationship is essential. A deeper understanding could guide the selection of therapeutic candidates, refine patient selection, and optimize the timing of treatment delivery. In this review, we describe the available evidence that has investigated the impact of age on remyelination in people with multiple sclerosis. We categorize these into pathological, imaging and clinical studies. We explore the challenges in measuring remyelination in humans and determine the implications for the connection between remyelination and age. Current evidence suggests that there is reduced capacity for remyelination with advancing age in people with multiple sclerosis. However, these findings are at times inconsistent, and the precise contribution of ageing to remyelination failure is unclear. There does not appear to be an age cut-off beyond which remyelination is not possible, as there are pathological data supporting remyelination occurring, to some extent, across all ages. Interestingly, the impact of age may vary by lesion location. Further targeted research, specifically exploring the relationship between ageing and remyelination, is needed. With emerging evidence that ageing processes might be malleable, we conclude that targeting the biology of ageing might also be an important strategy to therapeutically enhance remyelination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.