Trial reportDrug testing and analysis2025
Prolonged Detection of GHB Intake in Urine: Are We Finally There?
Trial report in Drug testing and analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endogenous Levels, Detection Time, and Symptoms of Gamma-Hydroxybutyric Acid: Results From a Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2025Trial
- Prolonged Detection of GHB Intake in Urine: Are We Finally There?Drug testing and analysis · 2025Trial
- Zwitterionic stationary phases: advances and trends in the HILIC chromatography of biomolecules and pharmaceuticals.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) has been implicated in drug-facilitated sexual assault (DFSA). However, due to its rapid elimination and the challenge of distinguishing exogenous from endogenous levels, GHB is likely to be significantly underestimated in DFSA cases. Consequently, previous research has focused on identifying biomarkers associated with GHB intake that persist longer than GHB itself. Conjugates of GHB with amino acids and pentose have been proposed as potential candidates, but data on their detection times remain limited. In this study, a randomised, placebo-controlled trial involving 30 healthy volunteers was conducted. Urine samples were collected at regular intervals over 5 days post-administration. Using a validated LC-MS/MS method, we quantified known and proposed GHB biomarkers, aiming to identify those capable of extending the detection window. GHB-amino acid conjugates showed limited utility beyond early time points, whereas a tentatively identified GHB-pentose emerged as a very promising marker. With structural confirmation and further validation, it may allow reliable detection for at least 24 h after intake, representing a significant advance in DFSA investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.