ReviewAutism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research2025
Advanced Quantitative Microstructure Imaging in Autism: A Review of Methodology, Group Differences, and Associations With Developmental Outcomes.
Review in Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advanced Quantitative Microstructure Imaging in Autism: A Review of Methodology, Group Differences, and Associations With Developmental Outcomes.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Emerging evidence highlights widespread alterations in white matter microstructure in autism. Advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have enabled more precise examinations of these microstructural changes, leading to increased use of quantitative MRI techniques in autism research. This review summarizes the current landscape of these techniques, focusing on methodology, group differences, developmental associations, and regional variations. Following PRISMA guidelines, 34 studies published between 2006 and 2024 that employed advanced MRI techniques were reviewed. These included diffusion MRI signal representations (diffusion kurtosis imaging [DKI] and constrained spherical deconvolution [CSD]) and biophysical models (neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging [NODDI] and white matter tract integrity [WMTI]), as well as relaxometry and magnetization transfer imaging (MTI). CSD and NODDI were the most frequently used, while MTI was the least utilized, with notable variations in acquisition parameters and processing methods across the techniques. Findings suggest relatively consistent lower values of fixel-based analysis measures (CSD) and neurite density index (NODDI) across major white matter regions, while findings from DKI, WMTI, and relaxometry varied. Measures from these techniques were associated with various developmental outcomes, including cognitive, emotional, and social behaviors. Limitations and implications are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.