ArticleAnnals of Saudi medicine
Detection of
Article in Annals of Saudi medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical and Microbiological Characteristics of EarlyAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Field Evaluation of the ClaID PCR System Reveals Predominance of Clade I-Associated Molecular Profiles Among ClinicalAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
objectivesThe aim of this study was to determine the virulence of
designRetrospective cohort.
settingSingle-center. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis study was conducted between August 2022 and December 2023 at Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital. ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 and ITS1-ITS4 gene regions of the rDNA gene of
main outcome measuresVariations in SAMPLE SIZE: Forty-four isolates from 31 patients.
resultsAccording to gene regions, nine different variations were identified in our hospital, with VAR-1 being the most common. Twenty-five (80.6%) of the patients died and isolation of the causative agent was between days 1-30 in 13 (41.9%) patients. Antibiotic use, ICU admission rate, and central venous catheter use in patients were 29 (93.6%), 28 (90.3%), and 21 (67.7%), respectively. Hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM) and septic shock were found in 14 (45.2%), 13 (41.9%) and 10 (32.3%) patients, respectively. Antifungal resistance rates of the isolates were determined as 97.7% and 84.1% for amphotericin B and fluconazole, respectively. No resistance to micafungin and caspofungin was detected. The survival rate with echinocandin use was 22% (4 patients).
conclusionIdentification of gene regions is valuable in determining the pathogenicity of LIMITATIONS: Single center setting; gene regions could not be expressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.