ReviewTherapeutic delivery2025
Clinical potential of CAR T cell-derived extracellular vesicles (CAR-EVs) in cancer therapy: a cell-free approach.
Review in Therapeutic delivery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- CAR T cell engineering approaches to minimise toxicities.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2026Review
- Engineered CAR-T extracellular vesicles loaded with miR-17-5p inhibitor suppress hepatocellular carcinoma progression.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a revolutionary cancer treatment, but it has severe side effects. Extracellular vesicles (EVs), nanovesicles released by CAR T cells, known as CAR T-cell-derived EVs (CAR-EVs), are a potential alternative owing to their role in intercellular communication. This review comprehensively explores the clinical potential of CAR-EVs for cancer therapy, starting with their biogenesis and cargo, which include unique therapeutic molecules. It reviews the mechanisms underlying CAR-EV-mediated anticancer effects and presents preclinical evidence demonstrating efficacy across various cancers, including hematological malignancies and solid tumors. The review further discusses preclinical data and advantages over existing CAR T-cell therapies, emphasizing the need for future clinical studies to assess the safety and efficacy of CAR-EVs in cancer patients. This review also summarizes preliminary findings and challenges, proposing strategies to improve EV targeting and cargo delivery. Additionally, this review highlights unexplored aspects of EV biology in the context of CAR T-cell therapies. In conclusion, CAR-EVs offer a viable option for cancer therapy, with potential advantages over conventional CAR T-cell therapies. However, future research is needed to optimize manufacturing, distribution, and clinical application for achieve maximum therapeutic efficacy and favorable patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.