Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41047659›Full record

SynthesisPhysiological reports2025

Meta-analysis of high-intensity interval training and alternative modalities for enhancing aerobic and anaerobic endurance in young athletes.

Manuel Matzka, Mascha Lenk, Benedikt Meixner, Billy Sperlich

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Physiological reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Manuel MatzkaDepartment of Sport Science, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Integrative and Experimental Exercise Science & Training, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2771-3030
Mascha LenkDepartment of Sport Science, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Integrative and Experimental Exercise Science & Training, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-5204-3569
Benedikt MeixnerDepartment of Sport Science, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Integrative and Experimental Exercise Science & Training, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7044-9426
Billy SperlichDepartment of Sport Science, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Integrative and Experimental Exercise Science & Training, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4686-8561

Funding

Projekt DEAL
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This meta-analysis examined whether HIIT outperforms low-intensity endurance training (LIET), generic training (GT), or sport-specific drills (SSD) in improving aerobic and anaerobic endurance in youth athletes. Systematic searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science identified studies comparing HIIT with LIET, GT, or SSD in athletes aged ≤18 years. Outcomes included maximal oxygen uptake (VO

Indexed as

AthletesAthletic PerformanceEndurance TrainingHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingPhysical EnduranceAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleOxygen Consumptionchildrenhigh intensityinterval trainingyouth

Identifiers

PMID41047659
PMCPMC12497894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.