SynthesisOral diseases2026
Adverse Events in Nonsurgical Facial Aesthetic Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Oral diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Ultrasound imaging in aesthetic medicine: safety and precision in injectable procedures.Journal of ultrasound · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the prevalence and clinical profile of treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) associated with: (1) botulinum toxin in the upper face; (2) hyaluronic acid fillers in the lower face and nasolabial folds; and (3) nonsurgical facelifts with absorbable threads.
methodsSearches were conducted in five electronic databases and gray literature. Proportion meta-analyses were performed to estimate the prevalence of TRAE for each type of aesthetic procedure.
results42 studies were included. TRAEs were reported in 34.8% of included patients. The highest TRAEs prevalence was associated with hyaluronic acid fillers (63.0%, 95% CI: 35%-84%), followed by nonsurgical facelifts with absorbable threads (20.0%, 95% CI: 8%-41%) and botulinum toxin in the upper face (18.0%, 95% CI: 10%-32%). The most frequently reported TRAEs were swelling (22.4%) and pain (19.0%) for hyaluronic acid fillers; pain (31.5%) and bruising (23.4%) for nonsurgical facelifts with threads; and headache for botulinum toxins. Hyaluronic acid fillers accounted for 67.3% of all TRAEs (n = 3729/4971).
conclusionsThe overall prevalence of adverse events was low for botulinum toxin and thread lifts, but high for hyaluronic acid fillers. Future studies should report all adverse events, expected and not expected, detailing the number of patients affected, total events, onset and recovery times, severity, and provider category.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.