ArticleJournal of behavioral medicine2025
Using objective measures to evaluate the role of physical activity as a compensatory mechanism of emotion regulation.
Article in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Both emotion regulation and physical activity are associated with improved emotional well-being, including high self-esteem. However, most prior work comparing this relationship is limited by either subjective bias or ecological validity. Using objective (i.e., accelerometer-derived) measures of physical activity, this study investigated the relationship between moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and two trait emotion regulation strategies. We predicted that trait reappraisal (i.e., the habitual use of cognitive reappraisal to regulate emotions in daily life), but not trait suppression (i.e., the habitual use of expressive suppression to regulate emotions in daily life), would be associated with higher engagement in MVPA. We also predicted that physical activity would buffer reliance on trait reappraisal, such that individuals who engaged in more MVPA would be less likely to report emotion regulation difficulties or low self-esteem. Participants (N = 251 adults, ages 17-88 years) filled out questionnaires assessing trait emotion regulation, emotion regulation difficulties, and self-esteem, and wore an ActiGraph® on their non-dominant wrist for one week (M(SD) = 7.46(2.32) days). Regression and moderation analyses were conducted on variables of interest. Neither trait reappraisal nor suppression were associated with MVPA. MVPA significantly moderated the negative relationship between trait reappraisal and emotion regulation difficulties, such that the relationship was stronger at lower levels of MVPA. Effects were not found with self-esteem or trait suppression. These results indicate that MVPA may be beneficial in maintaining emotional well-being, particularly in the face of emotion regulation difficulties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.