ArticleScientific reports2025
Predictive modelling and high-performance enhancement smart thz antennas for 6 g applications using regression machine learning approaches.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This research introduces a novel design for a graphene-based multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) antenna, specifically developed for sixth generation (6G) terahertz (THz) applications. The proposed antenna demonstrates multi-resonant behavior across three broad bandwidths: 2.479 THz (1.00-3.49 THz), 0.516 THz (3.64-4.156 THz), and 1.694 THz (4.50-6.20 THz). It achieves a peak gain of 13.41 dB, exceptional isolation of -34.2 dB, and a high efficiency of up to 90%. The design was developed using CST Studio Suite and validated through an RLC equivalent circuit model in ADS. This ensured accurate representation of its electromagnetic behavior. To improve the predictive capabilities of the antenna design process, five supervised regression-based machine learning (ML) models were employed. The models used were Extra Trees, Random Forest, Decision Tree, Ridge Regression, and Gaussian Process Regression. Among these, the Extra Trees Regression model delivered the highest prediction accuracy, achieving a mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.51%, a mean squared error (MSE) of 0.44%, and an R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.