ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026
The relative contribution of discs and vertebral bodies to thoracic kyphosis in healthy volunteers.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionUnderstanding the normal anatomy of thoracic kyphosis (TK) in healthy subjects is essential for evaluating sagittal malalignment and planning the surgery accordingly. The aim of this study was to identify the proportion of thoracic kyphosis originating from disc versus vertebral body shape and to describe its variation according to age and thoracic kyphosis magnitude.
methodsThis study was a retrospective review of a prospective multicenter database of healthy volunteers aged 18 years or older. Vertebral body and disc sagittal Cobb angles were measured at each level and summed within each of the 3 TK regions (Upper, Middle and Lower TK). Relative contributions of discs and vertebral bodies to Upper, Middle, Lower, and total TK were assessed in the whole cohort, and according to age and TK groups, after stratification. Finally, a multivariate analysis including age and TK magnitude was conducted.
resultsAmong these 645 subjects, the mean age was 37.6 ± 16.3 years with 51% of females. Intervertebral discs were kyphotic in Upper and Middle TK with respective discs contribution to total TK of 4.2% and 9.6%, for a total of 13.8% of total kyphosis. Lower TK discs were lordotic, with a participation of -13.2% of total TK, leading to an overall discs contribution to TK of 0.6%. Vertebral bodies were all kyphotic with a contribution of 99.4% of total kyphosis. Vertebral bodies kyphosis increased across age groups for Middle TK (p = 0.004), Lower TK (p < 0.001), and Total TK (p < 0.001). Discs contributions to total TK increased significantly with increasing TK (-13.8% for Low TK, -1.5% for Average-Low TK, 5.7% for Average-High TK and 9.1% for High TK), (p < 0.001). Finally, discs contribution was significantly greater in males than in females, with respective values of 2.6% and -1.8% (p = 0.01).
conclusionThis study highlights the predominant role of vertebral bodies contribution to thoracic kyphosis, 99.4% on average. The contribution of disc to thoracic kyphosis (values ranging from -13.8% to 9.1%) increases significantly with increasing thoracic kyphosis magnitude. The association of age with thoracic kyphosis was greater for vertebral bodies than discs, particularly in Middle and Lower TK.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41047402What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.