ArticleCardiovascular ultrasound2025
Prognostic value of adenosine stress echocardiography in chronic coronary syndromes with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.
Article in Cardiovascular ultrasound, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe prognostic value of functional echocardiographic parameters for risk stratification in chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) remains incompletely understood. This study aimed to integrate resting and stress echocardiographic parameters to identify sensitive non-invasive predictors of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs).
methodsA total of 754 CCS patients with a resting left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50% undergoing adenosine stress echocardiography were prospectively enrolled. Parameters including myocardial perfusion, coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR), and myocardial work were assessed. Resting and stress values were compared within groups, while dynamic changes were analyzed between CFVR-normal and impaired subgroups. Cox regression was used to identify independent predictors.
resultsThe incidence of MACEs was significantly higher in patients with impaired CFVR compared to those with normal CFVR (71.4% vs. 6.2%, P < 0.0001). After stress, the impaired CFVR group exhibited myocardial perfusion defects, mechanical dyssynchrony, and reduced myocardial work efficiency, in contrast to the normal CFVR group. Patients with impaired CFVR combined with regional wall motion and perfusion abnormalities had the worst prognosis. Multivariate Cox model integrating CFVR and stress-derived dynamic parameters demonstrated superior predictive performance for MACEs, significantly exceeding that of the stress-substitution and base models (C-index: 0.867 vs. 0.841 vs. 0.709).
conclusionIn CCS patients with preserved LVEF, reduced CFVR indicates early myocardial dysfunction and predicts the worst prognosis when combined with wall motion and perfusion abnormalities. An integrated functional model combining CFVR and dynamic stress parameters enhances risk stratification for MACEs and supports individualized therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.