ArticleThe world journal of men's health2026
Enhancing Statistical Competence in Andrology: Outcomes of an Online Medical Statistics Training Program.
Article in The world journal of men's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study evaluates the impact of a structured online medical statistics webinar on researchers in andrology, both clinicians and non-clinicians. The objectives were to: 1) emphasize the critical role of statistical literacy in medical and biomedical research, 2) evaluate participants' baseline knowledge, 3) determine the impact of the webinar on knowledge acquisition and satisfaction, and 4) analyze the influence of gender and institutional setting on learning outcomes. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe Global Andrology Forum (GAF) conducted a webinar comprising four expert-led lectures on medical statistics and male infertility research. Participants completed three online surveys evaluating baseline characteristics, pre- and post-course knowledge, and satisfaction.
resultsPost-webinar analysis showed a significant improvement in statistical knowledge, with the mean percentage of correct responses rising from 55.6% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 51.35-59.86) to 66.8% (95% CI: 62.48-71.14) (p<0.05). Female participants demonstrated over twice as much a greater average score increase (16.1) compared to males (7.9), though the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.092). Participants from public institutions showed the most substantial improvement (p<0.001), while private sector participants had a more modest and non-significant increase (p=0.054). Overall satisfaction was high, with 77.6% of participants indicating that they would recommend the course to their colleagues.
conclusionsThis structured online webinar significantly improved the participants' statistical knowledge, highlighting the importance of such training in medical research. The high levels of participant satisfaction and positive feedback regarding the course underscore the webinar's success. This study highlights the potential for future targeted online statistical educational initiatives and the need for such training for researchers in andrology and biomedicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.