Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41047351›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology2026

Effect Modification and Its Impact on Preventable and Attributable Fractions in the Potential Outcomes Framework.

Bronner P Gonçalves, Etsuji Suzuki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bronner P GonçalvesFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey.ORCID 0000-0002-3329-6050
Etsuji SuzukiDepartment of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University.ORCID 0000-0002-1290-5793

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolicy decisions should be guided by measures that capture the impact of exposures on outcomes and that explicitly account for present-day exposure distribution. Both the preventable and attributable fractions have been used for this purpose; however, exposure effects can vary across subpopulations, and when this occurs, appropriate interpretation of these measures should be facilitated by a discussion of the contributions of different subpopulations.

methodsWe analyze preventable and attributable fractions in the presence of effect modification. In particular, we use potential outcomes to formally define these quantities and to clarify the weighting of different strata in the total population measures.

resultsOur derivations show that stratum-specific preventable and attributable fractions are weighted in proportion to the relative frequencies of effect modifiers among individuals with the outcome of interest. We also demonstrate that these weights are valid for the related quantities, preventable and attributable proportions. Finally, we present an example that illustrates how effect modification affects interpretation of these measures.

conclusionIn sum, when effect modification is present, investigators should consider reporting these measures by the relevant population strata, and information that would allow quantification of their implicit weights in the total population estimate. Our study provides a formal justification for this approach.

Indexed as

Effect Modifier, EpidemiologicHumansattributable fractioncausalityeffect modificationpreventable fraction

Identifiers

PMID41047351
PMCPMC13085676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.