ArticleBMJ open2025
Evaluation of an intervention to increase topical sunscreen use in German outdoor workers: study protocol for the non-randomised controlled intervention study ProtExSun.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Increasing topical sunscreen use in German outdoor workers: results of a non-randomised controlled intervention study.BMC public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSquamous cell carcinoma and multiple actinic keratoses caused by solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR) are among the most frequently recognised occupational diseases in Germany. Employees who regularly work outdoors, for example, in the construction industry, agriculture, forestry and gardening, are at a higher risk of developing occupational skin cancer. However, sun-safety behaviour in outdoor workers is currently insufficient. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effectiveness of an intervention to increase sunscreen use among outdoor workers. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this non-randomised, controlled intervention study, 234 outdoor workers from different companies in industries with outdoor working activities based in Germany will be included. The study population, aged 18 years and above, has to be intensively exposed to solar UVR of regularly 1 hour or more per day. The intervention group will receive a sunscreen package as well as health education. The control group follows the practice in their companies ('treatment-as-usual'). At the beginning of the study, after 3 months and at the end of the study (after 6 months), both groups filled in different questionnaires. In addition, stratum corneum (SC) samples will be collected at the beginning and after 3 months. The primary outcome-increase in the frequency of sunscreen use during work and in leisure time-will be assessed from data on self-reported sunscreen use. The secondary outcomes include sun protection behaviour, knowledge about sun protection and skin cancer, and acceptance of the provided sunscreens. Further secondary outcomes include internal UV dose and UV-related immune response, determined by the levels of SC biomarkers. Data will be analysed using both descriptive and inferential methods. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol followed the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (2013) and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Osnabrück University, Germany (reference Ethik-37/2024). Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00035178.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.