ArticleBMJ open2025
More is more? The role of surgeon in the volume-outcome relationship: an Italian population-based cohort study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Hospital and surgeon volume versus outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery: umbrella review and meta-analysis.BJS open · 2026Pooled it
- Observational
- Organizational Resources in Rare Cancer Outcomes: Survival Analysis After Surgery for Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma.Cancers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe relationship between surgical volume and clinical outcomes is complex and varies considerably across surgical specialties. While the role of hospital volume is well-established, the specific contribution of surgeon-level volume and the interaction between these two factors are less clear.
objectivesThis study investigates the association between surgeon volume and clinical outcomes for surgeons performing breast-conserving surgery for malignant breast cancer, laparoscopic cholecystectomy and surgery for malignant colon cancer.
methodsData from the Lazio Region's health information systems (2020-2023) were analysed. Primary outcomes included 120-day reinterventions after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer, 30-day complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 30-day mortality after colon cancer surgery. The association between surgeon volume and outcomes was examined for all surgeons performing at least five procedures annually in Lazio hospitals. A stratified analysis was conducted to assess the impact of hospital volume on the surgeon-volume-outcome relationship, comparing outcomes between surgeons in low-volume and high-volume hospitals. Fractional polynomial and segmented regression models were employed to identify non-linear relationships and potential breakpoints in the surgeon volume-outcome association.
resultsHigher-volume surgeons demonstrated significantly improved outcomes across all three procedures, including lower reintervention rates, fewer complications and reduced mortality. This positive association was further amplified for surgeons practising in high-volume hospitals. Graphical analysis, which involved stratifying the volume-outcome relationship for individual surgeons by hospital volume (high vs low), strongly suggested a synergistic effect between surgeon and hospital volume, clearly illustrating how the benefits of higher surgeon volume were further amplified in high-volume settings.
conclusionsThese findings underscore the critical role of both surgeon-level and hospital-level factors in determining surgical outcomes. Optimising patient care requires a comprehensive approach that considers both individual surgeon performance and the overall quality of the healthcare system. Future research should focus on elucidating the underlying mechanisms driving these associations to inform the development of strategies for improving surgical care delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.