Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41047241›Full record

ReviewThorax2026

Current strategies and future directions to enhance recovery following critical illness.

Mark Andonovic, Martin Shaw, Peter Hartley, Snigdha Jain, Leanne Boehm, Kelly Toth, Richard Bourne, Kimberley Joy Haines, Valerie Danesh, Pamela MacTavish and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Thorax, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Mark AndonovicUniversity of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5290-4680
Martin ShawUniversity of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Peter HartleyUniversity of Cambridge Clinical School, Cambridge, England, UK.
Snigdha JainYale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Leanne BoehmSchool of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Kelly TothCenter for Research, Investigation and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Richard BourneSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, England, UK.
Kimberley Joy HainesDepartment of Physiotherapy, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2882-1594
Valerie DaneshCenter for Applied Health Research, Baylor Scott and White Health, Dallas, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2078-2578
Pamela MacTavishNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Thomas ValleyUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Regis Goulart RosaInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Christie DochertyUniversity of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Kevin GarrityUniversity of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Philip McCallAcademic Unit of Anaesthesia, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Alexander TracyOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, England, UK.
Nazir I LoneUsher Institute for Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2707-2779
Joanne McPeakeThe Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, UK jm2565@medschl.cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8206-6801

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improvements in critical care treatments have led to an increased number of survivors of critical illness and an enhanced recognition of the problems which these patients encounter. Despite this, the ideal strategies to both prevent and manage the problems which people face are yet to be fully elucidated.This review explores the current methods employed to help mitigate problems encountered by survivors of critical illnesses and current barriers that limit their implementation. We will explore the effect of these issues on under-represented communities and the feasibility of delivering these strategies globally, as well as recent advances in mechanistic research and methodological innovation as promising areas for further work. In doing so, it summarises the potential avenues for future research with a view to advancing clinical care and outcomes in survivors of critical illness.

Indexed as

Critical CareCritical IllnessSurvivorsHumansCritical Care

Identifiers

PMID41047241
PMCPMC13217043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.