ReviewComprehensive reviews in food science and food safety2025
An Overview of West African Traditional Soft Cheese: Processing, Safety, and Quality Characteristics.
Review in Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An Overview of West African Traditional Soft Cheese: Processing, Safety, and Quality Characteristics.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
West African soft cheese (WASC) is widely consumed and nutritionally valuable across West Africa. It also sustains livelihoods, particularly among Fulani households, by providing regular income for women and strengthens household food security and autonomy. However, concerns persist about its safety and quality. A scoping review was conducted to synthesize evidence on WASC processing, safety, and quality. The findings showed that cow's milk (88.6%) and Calotropis procera (77.1%) were the predominant milk source and coagulant, respectively. Two research areas contribute to about one third of the total articles reviewed: alternative coagulants (22.9%) and partial substitution of cow's milk (11.4%). Among the various coagulants tested, only Carica papaya consistently achieved yields comparable to Cal. procera. Partial substitution with plant-based milks differentially influenced yield and composition. Findings indicated frequent microbiological hazards in market-sold WASC, with aerobic plate counts often exceeding limits and recurrent reports of coliforms and pathogens (e.g., Escherichia coli, Salmonella). In contrast, WASC produced under controlled laboratory conditions showed low aerobic counts and the absence of coliforms. In general, reporting quality was a major limitation, as most of the studies reviewed failed in reporting key processing parameters such as heating temperatures and times, coagulant concentration, and coagulation time, factors essential for assessing and reproducing cheese quality. In conclusion, this review underscores the urgent need for hygiene interventions across the value chain. Moreover, comprehensive research is needed to assess how different coagulants, extraction methods, heating conditions, and the alternatives could affect the yield, sensory characteristics, and overall quality of WASC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.