Trial reportJournal of primary care & community health
Effects of Tuina in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multidisciplinary expert consensus on clinical diagnosis and therapies for low back pain.Bone research · 2026Article
- Therapeutic effect of modified meridian-guided acupoint pressing on lumbar facet joint osteoarthritis: an integrated microbiomics and metabolomics analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Mechanical cues as immunomodulators in neuroinflammation-driven spinal sensitization: analgesic mechanisms and therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP) is a prevalent, disabling condition worldwide. Tuina, a traditional Chinese manual therapy, has shown potential benefits, but evidence remains limited.
objectiveThis study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of Tuina therapy in managing CNLBP in a U.S. POPULATION:
methodsA prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted at Mayo Clinic Rochester campus (February 2020-April 2024). 204 participants with CNLBP were randomized into 3 groups: Tuina (N = 68), physical therapy (N = 68), or a combination of both (N = 68). Each group received 6 treatments over 2 months. The primary outcome was pain intensity (VAS); secondary outcomes included disability (ODI), quality of life (SF-36), and adverse events. Additionally, participants completed a satisfaction survey at the end of the trial. Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) was used for survey data collection. Data was assessed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the multiple repeated measurements, Kruskal-Wallis tests, while Chi-square tests, and Bonferroni correction in SAS software.
results185 subjects completed the study. Significant decreases in VAS, ODI, and SF-36 Overall Physical scores were found from baseline, to post treatment and follow-up in all groups (
conclusionTuina therapy showed comparable benefits to physical therapy and combined treatment of both in improving pain, function, and quality of life in patients with CNLBP. With high patient satisfaction and a favorable safety profile, Tuina appears to be a safe and acceptable non-invasive treatment option. Further studies are needed to validate these findings in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.