ArticleLa Radiologia medica2026
CCM-ITALUNG2 pilot on lung cancer screening in Italy: recruitment, integration with smoking cessation and baseline results.
Article in La Radiologia medica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Related Risks in Interventional Pulmonology: An Exploratory Enumeration and Ranking Study Across Five General-Purpose Large Language Models.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Thoracic ultrasound elastography in pleural and subpleural diseases: a narrative review.Journal of ultrasound · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Induced Deskilling in Interventional Pulmonology: An International Cross-Sectional Survey on Risk Perception and Mitigation Strategies.Advances in respiratory medicine · 2026Observational
- Prevalence of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities (ILAs) in Italian Lung Cancer Screening Programs: A Monocentric Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for pleural effusion and pneumothorax detection on thoracic ultrasound: an educational viewpoint on the promise, pitfalls and path forward.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026Article
- Highlights from the Italian National Congress of Imaging in Pulmonology 2025: fostering implementation of advanced technologies for precision patient-centered care.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Automated Analysis for Pleural Effusion Detection on Thoracic Ultrasound: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Decoding the "black-box": explainable artificial intelligence towards trustworthy advancement in respiratory medicine.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026Article
- Underreporting of Coronary Stents in LDCT for Lung Cancer Screening and Their Differentiation From Severe Coronary Artery Calcifications.Journal of computer assisted tomographyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe CCM-ITALUNG2 pilot was implemented to evaluate the feasibility of an organized lung cancer (LC) screening programme in five Italian centres.
methodsThe screening pathway included invitation, recruitment, referral to Smoking Cessation Services (SCSs), and use of the Lung-RADS score for low-dose CT reading. Dedicated screening operators followed up participants from recruitment through the clinical follow-up established by multidisciplinary teams. Eligibility criteria included age 55-75 years, ever-smokers with ≥ 25 pack-years; quit within the past 10 years. Baseline round results are presented.
resultsFrom November 2022 to May 2024, 1,144 of the 1,971 invited individuals (58.0%) were recruited following different strategies including in-person invitation by general practitioners (GPs; 356 subjects, 31.9%) or other healthcare personnel (18.1%), self-presentation (36.3%), and phone invitation using GPs' patient lists (13.7%). Among current smokers, 38.5% accepted referral to SCSs. Eighteen subjects (77.8% in stage I-II) were diagnosed with LC (prevalent LC rate 1.57%). The mean time to surgery was 147 days (standard deviation 73); the false-positive rate was 1.38% (15/1,085).
conclusionsBy utilizing different organizational models, the pilot was tailored to the specific characteristics of each centre. Phone invitations from GPs' patient lists, in-person invitations by GPs and other healthcare personnel, and self-presentation might enhance equity of access in comparison with self-referral only. Dedicated screening operators, the use of the Lung-RADS scoring system, and a structured clinical follow-up supported participants throughout the screening pathway. Delivering brief advice for smoking cessation during recruitment and offering SCS referral were feasible within the screening pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41046319What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.