ArticleBone marrow transplantation2026
Comparison of single-unit umbilical cord blood transplantation and haploidentical transplantation using posttransplant cyclophosphamide during first complete remission of acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Choosing an optimal alternative donor is an important clinical concern in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). In Japan, single-unit umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) has been widely used in the last two decades, whereas HCT from HLA-haploidentical related donors (haplo-HCT) has been increasingly used following the advent of posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. This registry-based study aimed to compare outcomes between single-unit UCBT (n = 848) and PTCY-based haplo-HCT (n = 241) performed during first complete remission in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. UCBT was associated with a lower likelihood of engraftment (P < 0.001), a higher risk of grade 2-4 and grade 3-4 acute GVHD (P = 0.003 each), and a lower risk of extensive chronic GVHD (P = 0.048). The UCBT and haplo-HCT groups did not significantly differ in 3-year probabilities of overall survival (68% versus 69%, P = 0.686), GVHD/relapse-free survival (55% versus 54%, P = 0.866), relapse (14% versus 16%, P = 0.463), and non-relapse mortality (21% versus 19%, P = 0.403), respectively, which were confirmed with multivariate analysis. These results indicate that both procedures should be considered viable options for patients lacking a matched donor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41046309What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.