Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41046300›Full record

ArticleGeroScience2026

Pharmacokinetic analysis of intermittent rapamycin administration in early-stage Alzheimer's Disease.

Helen Annervik Wallgren, Miia Kivipelto, Pontus Plavén-Sigray, Jonas E Svensson

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06022068 (Evaluating Rapamycin Treatment in Alzheimer's Disease Using Positron Emission Tomography), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06022068 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

Evaluating Rapamycin Treatment in Alzheimer's Disease Using Positron Emission Tomography (ERAP)

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2023 to 2025Enrolled14ConditionsAlzheimer DiseaseArmsSirolimus
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Anatomy of a Setback: A Taxonomy of Clinical Trial Failures in Alzheimer's Disease and Strategic Lessons for the Future.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Helen Annervik WallgrenTheme Inflammation and Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-1151-5691
Miia KivipeltoTheme Inflammation and Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Pontus Plavén-Sigray *Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jonas E Svensson *Theme Inflammation and Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. jonas.svensson@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2331-4913

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapamycin, an mTOR inhibitor used clinically for immunosuppression, shows promise for repurposing in age-related disorders, including Alzheimer's disease (AD). While the pharmacokinetics of daily rapamycin are well-characterized in transplant populations, limited data exist on intermittent dosing regimens in patients with neurodegenerative conditions. This open-label pilot study investigated the pharmacokinetic properties of weekly oral rapamycin in 13 patients with early-stage AD. Participants received 7 mg weekly (11 patients) or reduced doses (2 mg and 4 mg; 2 patients) for 26 weeks. Blood concentrations were measured at four timepoints (pre-dose/Cmin, and 1-, 3-, and 48-h post-dose) during week 13. Moderate interindividual variability was observed across timepoints (coefficient of variation was 0.28-0.40), with the 48-h sample showing the lowest variability (CoV = 0.28) and strongest correlation with Cmin from the previous dosing (r = 0.72). Estimate of terminal half-life (68.9 ± 13.6 h) aligned with previous studies. Blood concentrations at Cmin were below immunosuppressive levels in all participants. Our findings suggest that weekly rapamycin administration in AD patients results in acceptable pharmacokinetic variability, supporting fixed-dose regimens in future trials. The 48-h post-dose measurement appears optimal for monitoring blood concentrations. Additionally, our investigation into cerebrospinal fluid rapamycin quantification revealed methodological challenges due to analytical sensitivity limitations. The foremost limitation of this study was the sparse blood sampling schedule, with Cmin collected from the previous dosing occasion which prevented a complete AUC-calculation. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06022068) and EudraCT (2023-000127-36).

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseMTOR InhibitorsSirolimusAdministration, OralAgedAged, 80 and overDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMalePilot ProjectsImmunosuppressive AgentsMTOR InhibitorsSirolimusAlzheimer´s diseaseIntermittent dosingMTOR inhibitorNeurodegenerative diseasePharmacokineticsRapamycinSirolimus

Identifiers

PMID41046300
PMCPMC13355994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.