ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Predicting early progression to atezolizumab-bevacizumab in hepatocellular carcinoma: a clinical and imaging-based scoring system.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unmasking infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma: a pictorial essay.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Prognostic factors and treatment response in previously treated hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving Y-90 radioembolization combined with targeted-immunotherapy: an exploratory analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Clinical Significance of Intratumoral Contrast Pooling on Contrast-Enhanced CT After Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo develop a predictive model incorporating both clinical and imaging findings to predict early progression in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atezo-Bev) therapy. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 140 consecutive patients with HCC who initiated Atezo-Bev therapy between January 2020 and May 2022 at two tertiary care centres were retrospectively enrolled. Early progression was defined as progressive disease in the first response evaluation conducted at 4 weeks and 12 weeks after treatment initiation using dynamic CT or MRI. Images were reviewed by two radiologists. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the early progression scores.
resultsThe first response evaluation of Atezo-Bev therapy was conducted at a median of 56 days (interquartile range, 42-64 days) after treatment initiation. Approximately 40% (56/140) of patients with HCC showed early progression. The early progression score was defined as follows: (age < 60 years; 1 point) + (serum alpha-fetoprotein level ≥ 300 ng/mL; 3 points) + (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio ≥ 2.8; 1 point) + (infiltrative appearance; 2 points). At a score of 3 or higher, the early progression score showed sensitivity of 91.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 83.6-98.5%) and a specificity of 53.6% (95% CI: 42.9-64.2%). At a score of 6 or higher, the score demonstrated a sensitivity of 55.4% (95% CI: 42.3-68.4%) and a specificity of 91.7% (95% CI: 85.8-97.6%).
conclusionWe developed an early progression score that integrates clinical and imaging factors with high specificity to accurately predict early progression in patients with advanced HCC undergoing Atezo-Bev therapy. KEY POINTS: Question No validated imaging-based tool currently exists to predict early progression to Atezo-Bev therapy in advanced HCC. Findings Infiltrative tumour appearance, high AFP, high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and younger age were significantly associated with early progression. Clinical relevance A composite early progression score integrating clinical and imaging features showed high diagnostic accuracy for predicting treatment failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41046297What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.