ArticlePlant methods2025
Automated generation of ground truth images of greenhouse-grown plant shoots using a GAN approach.
Article in Plant methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harnessing artificial intelligence in plant breeding: innovations in digital phenotyping and breeding methodologies.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Review
- AI-integrated digital breeding for crop improvement.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The generation of a large amount of ground truth data is an essential bottleneck for the application of deep learning-based approaches to plant image analysis. In particular, the generation of accurately labeled images of various plant types at different developmental stages from multiple renderings is a laborious task that substantially extends the time required for AI model development and adaptation to new data. Here, generative adversarial networks (GANs) can potentially offer a solution by enabling widely automated synthesis of realistic images of plant and background structures. In this study, we present a two-stage GAN-based approach to generation of pairs of RGB and binary-segmented images of greenhouse-grown plant shoots. In the first stage, FastGAN is applied to augment original RGB images of greenhouse-grown plants using intensity and texture transformations. The augmented data were then employed as additional test sets for a Pix2Pix model trained on a limited set of 2D RGB images and their corresponding binary ground truth segmentation. This two-step approach was evaluated on unseen images of different greenhouse-grown plants. Our experimental results show that the accuracy of GAN predicted binary segmentation ranges between 0.88 and 0.95 in terms of the Dice coefficient. Among several loss functions tested, Sigmoid Loss enables the most efficient model convergence during the training achieving the highest average Dice Coefficient scores of 0.94 and 0.95 for Arabidopsis and maize images. This underscores the advantages of employing tailored loss functions for the optimization of model performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.