Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41046013›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2025

Towards a cardiovascular magnetic resonance foundation model for multi-task cardiac image analysis.

Athira J Jacob, Indraneel Borgohain, Teodora Chitiboi, Puneet Sharma, Dorin Comaniciu, Daniel Rueckert

Abstract readMulticenter StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Bridging the gap in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging artificial intelligence implementations: From ambitious goals to real-world progress using foundation models.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Athira J JacobDigital Technology and Innovation, Siemens Healthineers, Princeton, New Jersey, USA; AI in Healthcare and Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: athira.jacob@siemens-healthineers.com.
Indraneel BorgohainDigital Technology and Innovation, Siemens Healthineers, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Teodora ChitiboiDigital Technology and Innovation, Siemens Healthineers, Princeton, New Jersey, USA; Digital Technology and Innovation, Siemens Healthineers AG, Hamburg, Germany.
Puneet SharmaDigital Technology and Innovation, Siemens Healthineers, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Dorin ComaniciuDigital Technology and Innovation, Siemens Healthineers, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Daniel RueckertAI in Healthcare and Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a complex imaging modality requiring a broad variety of image processing tasks for comprehensive assessment of the study. Recently, foundation models (FM) have shown promise for automated image analyses in natural images (NI). In this study, a CMR-specific vision FM was developed and then finetuned in a supervised manner for nine different imaging tasks typical to a CMR workflow, including classification, segmentation, landmark localization, and pathology detection.

methodsA ViT-S/8 model was trained in a self-supervised manner using DINO on 36 million CMR images from 27,524 subjects from three sources (UK Biobank and two clinical centers). The model was then finetuned for nine tasks: classification (sequence, cine view), segmentation (cine SAX, cine LAX, LGE SAX, Mapping SAX), landmark localization, pathology detection (LGE, cardiac disease), on data from various sources (both public and three clinical datasets). The results were compared against metrics from state-of-the-art methods on the same tasks. A comparable baseline model was also trained on the same datasets for direct comparison. Additionally, the effect of pretraining strategy, as well as generalization and few-shot performance (training on few labeled samples) was explored for the pretrained model, compared to the baseline.

resultsThe proposed model obtained similar performance or moderate improvements to results reported in the literature in most tasks (except disease detection), without any task-specific optimization of methodology. The proposed model outperformed the baseline in most cases, with an average increase of 6.8% points (pp) for cine view classification, and 0.1 to 1.8 pp for segmentation tasks. The proposed method also obtained generally lower standard deviations in the metrics. Improvements of 3.7 and 6.6 pp for hyperenhancement detection from LGE and 14 pp for disease detection were observed. Ablation studies highlighted the importance of pretraining strategy, architecture, and the impact of domain shifts from pretraining to finetuning. Moreover, CMR-pretrained model achieved better generalization and few-shot performance compared to the baseline.

conclusionsVision FM specialized for medical imaging can improve accuracy and robustness over NI-FM. Self-supervised pretraining offers a resource-efficient, unified framework for CMR assessment, with the potential to accelerate the development of deep learning-based solutions for image analysis tasks, even with few annotated data available.

Indexed as

Heart DiseasesImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineSupervised Machine LearningFemaleHumansMalePredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsWorkflowCardiac MRIClassificationFew shot learningMedical foundation modelSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID41046013
PMCPMC12745146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.