ArticleCurrent biology : CB2025
Preemptive gain control in primary visual cortex.
Article in Current biology : CB, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neurons continuously adapt their response properties to their environment. In the visual cortex, this includes gain control processes such as contrast normalization, which matches neurons' limited dynamic response range to the prevailing contrasts. Contrast normalization converges to a state that is optimal for processing the current visual input but not for the new, unknown input that impinges on the retina after each eye movement. We hypothesized that this conflict between current (pre-saccadic) and future (post-saccadic) needs could be resolved by a preemptive reset of the contrast response function with every saccade. We investigated this hypothesis using multi-electrode array recordings in the primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey. As expected, exposure to high contrast during steady fixation led to reduced gain and a compressed contrast response function. In support of our preemptive gain control hypothesis, these gain changes were partially reversed during saccades, resulting in a contrast response function with a higher gain and a broader, more linear response range. Post-saccadic gain increases were accompanied by pre-saccadic gain decreases, which were anticorrelated, suggesting that a common mechanism underlies both changes. Our findings indicate that the ubiquitous biphasic peri-saccadic neural response is a signature of a pause-rebound mechanism that prepares for unknown future visual inputs by resetting the contrast response function. At the perceptual level, this leads us to reinterpret the pre-saccadic reduction in visual sensitivity (i.e., saccadic suppression) as a side effect of the beneficial signal-processing strategy of preemptive gain control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.